Posts Tagged green

King of the Environment?

I’m always looking at how I can cut my ‘landfill’ product use, and it always, as with anybody’s opinion starts with the household consumables.  What am I using and how can it be greener?

What am I using and how can it be greener?

I’ve been using King of Shaves for a number of years now, this is due to a number of factors that would boggle the mind of the marketing people responsible.  I originally picked up my first tube primarily because it looked cool, and I had seen it in FHM a few times; the second reason was that I’m the kind of guy that loves to root for the underdog, I think they make better products than the big boys, and you can recognise the passion that they put behind their products.  This doesn’t account for every company and product that doesn’t have a large market share, but I’m sure you can recognise the ones I’m talking about.

king_of_shaves_agel_menth_175ml_7017

Only recently I realised that King of Shaves have been doing something right, without actually saying it.  They’ve been using a simple pure plastic container that is easily recyclable for years.  This is unlike Gillette and the rest of the shaving accessory market, that have been putting out more and more complicated dispensers over the years.  Now as an environmentalist that has some idea of how recycling works, I know that it is far easier to recycle an item that contains one type of plastic, or even 2 that are easily separated.  The majority of recycling facilities across the globe can only recycle a few types of plastic, and if they are products with a metal base, plastic top, and glass insert, this gets chucked away due to the impossibilities of dismantling these items on the fly, to their respected destinations.

Now King of shaves is a good product, it’s one of the few shaving gels that do not cause me to break out, or burn my skin.  I still use a gillette razor, but given the next opportunity to switch, I think I’ll look into the new razor from King of Shaves, that is supposed to last longer.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Dog\'s dinnerNot my sort of thingGood but not for meWould try againLoved it! (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
Email This Post Email This Post

Douwe Egberts GREEN packaging

DSCF9004

We’ve been using Douwe Egberts instant range of coffee at home for a number of years now, this is for a number of reasons, primarily because it tastes better than other coffees on the market, but then again I don’t fall in the category that believes that Italian coffee is the best in the world, I prefer filtered (percolated) coffee, but then again that’s an argument for another article, because don’t get me started on the size of the handle that a coffee cup should have.

Douwe and Egberts Instant coffee range come in these re-usable jars that my wife and I wash and store things in, from spare change to spices, we use them for everything.  In fact I don’t think we’ve thrown a single jar out since we started buying them; the times when we bought another brand of instant coffee left us no choice but to throw them into the recycling bin.  Why aren’t we using past sauce jars with metal lids as a reusable jar for our kitchen?  The Douwe Egbert jars just look so much better, just like something out of an old apothecary; and you can decorate them with whatever label you want.

The Douwe Egbert jars just look so much better, just like something out of an old apothecary

As a few regulars in our fridge, we grate parmesan and store them in the jars, as well as sauces, and minced garlic.  Best of all, we chuck them in the dishwasher with no problems.  We did find that if you do chuck them in the dishwasher, remove the plastic liner on the cap, as water always seems to collect in the glass top, so chuck this plastic stopper liner into the cutlery holder of the Dishwasher so it doesn’t run amok in the machine.

For sustainability sake, and product packaging that I would gladly re-use again and again, I give Douwe Egberts 10 out of 10 for packaging.  If only other brands would follow suit..

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Dog\'s dinnerNot my sort of thingGood but not for meWould try againLoved it! (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
Email This Post Email This Post

Fun Facts You Didn’t Know About Recycling

recycling-3

“Recycling means more material to collect.”

FACT: The same amount of waste is generated as with an all-disposal system. That waste is just separated into useful categories that can be reprocessed into usable goods.

“Not recycling is cheaper than recycling.”

FACT: Recycling should always be compared against disposal, since the material still must be transported off campus. Not recycling means paying for more disposal.

“Since we have plenty of landfills, recycling isn’t important.”

FACT: Recycling has many more benefits than reduced landfill use, the chief of which are the conservation of natural resources (trees, oil, minerals, etc.), reduced energy consumption, and the pollution and environmental impact associated with them (clear-cutting, oil drilling, mining, burning coal to melt steel, etc.). By recycling, you are conserving natural resources and reducing the amount of pollution and greenhouse gasses released into the environment. Also the impact of landfills is greater than simply the space they take up. As organic matter (anything that was once living) breaks down in a landfill, it produces methane, a potent greenhouse gas. By reducing the amount of organic material sent to the landfill, by composting, paper recycling, etc., you are helping to reduce greenhouse gasses.

“Recycling bins are ugly and cannot fit into the local aesthetic.”

FACT: Recycling bins, which are the same as trash bins, come in every shape, style, and color and can fit into nearly any aesthetic scheme.

“Facilities Management staff go through the trash and pull out the recyclables before they reach the landfill.”

Anything thrown into the trashcan will end up in the landfill. The labor required to sort through trash after it has already been mixed is prohibitive and so almost never happens. The only feasible way of separating recyclables is “source separation”, meaning each person separates their trash at the time they throw it away. The only effort here is the difference between throwing trash into one bin or another.

“Only white paper is recyclable.”

FACT: Just about any type of paper is technically recyclable, including envelopes, post-it notes, colored paper, newspaper, and magazines. Some universal restrictions are waxy or thermal paper (for older fax machines), laminated paper, and food-stained paper. However, different recycling companies require different mixes and restrictions. Make sure to check with your recycling program to find what is recyclable in your program.

“Incineration is safe these days and you can burn it for the electricity.”

FACT: Incineration still produces emission including air pollutants and greenhouse gasses. While it is true that some incinerators also produce electricity, it is not without impact. Recycling the material, or reusing or reducing its use, will save electricity and is a much more efficient way of handling the material.

“It’s OK to throw something away as long as it’s biodegradable.”

FACT: Biodegradable waste breaks down into methane in the landfill, if at all. It is usually released into the atmosphere, where it is a potent greenhouse gas. Some landfills are actually big, sealed storage bins, which make the decomposition of any biodegradable substance impossible once the landfill has been sealed up. A better solution is to recycle the material, or even better, reuse it or reduce its use altogether. Non-biodegradable waste does not produce methane, but it also will not break down in the landfill, thus using more space. Composting biodegradable material is an effective option.

Fun Facts:

  • One ton of paper made completely from recycled scrap saves 7000 gallons of water, 4100 kilowatt-hours of energy, three cubic yards of landfill space, and 17 trees
  • Each year, the United States uses 85.5 million tons of paper, of which we recycle only 22%, or 19 million tons. Of the remaining paper, we could recycle up to 70% or 46 million tons. And those 46 million tons could save 782 million trees.
  • Recycling 1 ton of glass saves the equivalent in energy of 10 gallons of oil.
  • Americans represent only 5% of the world’s population, but generate 30% of the world’s garbage.
  • We can really accomplish a lot when we all pull together and recycle! During WWII, salvaging metal straps from corsets saved enough metal to build 2 warships.
  • Every individual in the United States produces an average of 4.3 lbs. of garbage every day!
  • Producing a soda can from recycled aluminum uses 96% less energy than manufacturing a can from ore and produces 95% less air pollution and 97% less water pollution.
  • Over a ton of resources are saved for every ton of glass recycled:
    • -1,330 lbs. of sand
    • -433 lbs. of soda ash
    • -433 lbs. of limestone
    • -151 lbs. of feldspar
  • Every ton of paper recycled saves enough energy to heat and air condition the average American home for at least six months.
  • Americans use four million plastic bottles every hour, yet only one out of four is recycled.
  • 1 ton of aluminum saves the equivalent in energy of 2,350 gallons of gasoline. This is equivalent to the amount of electricity used by the typical home over a period of 10 years!
  • The average American uses 650 lbs. of paper a year.
  • One ton of paper from recycled pulp saves 17 trees, 3 cubic yards of landfill space, 7000 gallons of water, 4200 kWh (enough to heat your home fore half a year), 390 gallons of oil, and prevents 60 pounds of air pollution.
  • More than half of plastic containers still go straight into landfills or incinerators.
  • Glass never wears out — it can be recycled forever! Bad news: Americans throw away enough glass bottles and jars every two weeks to fill the 1,350-foot towers of the World Trade Center. Good news: Americans recycled enough glass last year to fill New Jersey’s Giants Stadium more than 3 ½ times.
  • In 1993, for the first time in history, more paper was recovered for recycling in the United States than was landfilled.
  • The energy saved from recycling aluminum in 1993 alone was enough to light a city the size of Pittsburgh for six years.
  • “Tin” cans (like those used for tuna and soup) are actually 99% steel. Americans throw away enough steel every year to build all the new cars made in America.

Tags: , , , , ,

Dog\'s dinnerNot my sort of thingGood but not for meWould try againLoved it! (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
Email This Post Email This Post

Recycling Aluminium is Greener than New Aluminium

recycle

Aluminium is produced from bauxite, a clay-like ore that is rich in aluminium compounds. The aluminium is only found as a compound called alumina, which is a hard material consisting of aluminium combined with oxygen. This alumina has to be stripped of its oxygen in order to free the aluminium. The alumina is dissolved in a molten salt at a reduction plant and a powerful electric current is run though the liquid to separate the aluminium from the oxygen. This process uses large quantities of energy.

Recycling 1kg of aluminium saves up to 6kg of bauxite, 4kg of chemical products and 14 kWh of electricity.

Recycling aluminium requires only 5% of the energy and produces only 5% of the CO2 emissions as compared with primary production and reduces the waste going to landfill. Aluminium can be recycled indefinitely, as reprocessing does not damage its structure. Aluminium is also the most cost-effective material to recycle.

A recycled aluminium can saves enough energy to run a television for three hours

If all the aluminium cans in the UK were recycled there would be 14 million fewer full dustbins each year.

Tags: , , , ,

Dog\'s dinnerNot my sort of thingGood but not for meWould try againLoved it! (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
Email This Post Email This Post

8-Story Antigravity Forest Facade Takes Root

By Cliff Kuang 08.24.09

When Patrick Blanc was a boy, he suspended plants from his bedroom wall and ran their roots into a fish tank. The greenery received nourishment from the diluted—ahem—fertilizer and purified the water in return. Forty-five years on, the French botanist’s gardens have grown massive in scale. One inside a Portuguese shopping mall is larger than four tennis courts, and there’s one in Kuwait that’s almost as big. But Blanc’s recently completed facade for the Athenaeum hotel in London (shown) could be his most high-profile project yet. Looming over Green Park, it’s an eight-story antigravity forest composed of 12,000 plants.

Blanc uses a kind of techno-trellis as the underlying structure: A plastic-coated aluminum frame is fastened to the wall and covered with synthetic felt into which plant roots can burrow. A custom irrigation system keeps the felt moist with a fertilizer solution modeled after the rainwater that trickles through forest canopies.

But plants for this vertical landscape must be chosen with care. Because the walls are so high, conditions vary widely. The shade at ground level is perfect for rare Asian nettles; on the brighter upper stories, plants that usually cling to windblown cliff faces brave the blustery British breezes.

Blanc, who still has a fish-tank setup in his apartment, says his creations will always reach upward: “I leave horizontal gardens to others. I only think vertically.”

The vertical garden at the Athenaeum, which is eight stories tall, has 260 plant species and more than 12,000 plants

Eighty percent of the plants at the Athenaeum are evergreen; 20 percent are seasonal. They are planted according to environmental demands — those that need more sun, for example, go up top. Ferns go below, where there’s more shade.

Blanc designed the first vertical garden in Spain, which covers an entire wall facing the entrance of the CaixaForum Madrid, designed by starchitects Herzog & de Mueron

Please do visit Wired.com for the rest of the article, and more fantastic examples of this work

via 8-Story Antigravity Forest Facade Takes Root .

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Dog\'s dinnerNot my sort of thingGood but not for meWould try againLoved it! (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
Email This Post Email This Post